Categories: Employment Law

Do You Know The Rules Governing Access to Employee Social Media Accounts?

Social media – Facebook, Twitter and more – are a ubiquitous part of our lives, with more than 80% of all U.S. households currently using these applications. This fact has raised questions about whether employers have a right to review a potential hire’s social media accounts as part of background checks prior to hiring, and whether employers can demand or require a potential or current employee to provide user names and passwords for social media accounts so as to review their activities on those platforms.

On the first question – can employers use information on public online social media accounts as part of background checks… the answer is yes. Many employers currently do use public online profiles to obtain information on professional credentials, career objectives, maturity and judgment, abuse of drugs or alcohol, current employment status, and other red flags. However, it’s very important to remember that employers may NOT use personal information from such profiles such as age, race, disability, religion, national origin, or gender to discriminate when making a hiring decision.

What about demanding or requiring that an employee or job candidate handover user names and passwords to social media accounts?

While there are no federal laws prohibiting these actions – many states – including Connecticut have passed laws making that practice illegal. The recently enacted Connecticut law (SB 426 – An Act Concerning Employee Online Privacy) states:

This bill “prohibits employers from requesting or requiring an employee or job applicant to (1) provide the employer with a user name, password, or other way to access the employee’s or applicant’s personal online account (see below); (2) authenticate or access such an account in front of the employer; or (3) invite, or accept an invitation from, the employer to join a group affiliated with such an account.”

This new Connecticut bill does however allow “an employer, in compliance with state and federal law, to monitor, review, access, or block electronic data stored on an electronic communications device paid for in whole or in part by the employer or traveling through or stored on an employer’s network.”

 

The information provided above is made available by Kainen, Escalera & McHale, P.C. for educational purposes only. It is not intended to provide specific legal advice to your individual circumstances or legal questions. You acknowledge that neither your reading of, nor posting on, this site establishes an attorney-client relationship between you and our law firm, or any of our attorneys. This information should not be used as a substitute for seeking competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state nor is it provided for the specific purpose of soliciting your business on any particular matter. Readers of this information should not act upon anything communicated in it without seeking professional counsel.

Share

Recent Posts

Kainen, Escalera & McHale Attorneys Again Recognized by U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers®

We are pleased to announce that our law firm, Kainen, Escalera & McHale has again…

3 years ago

Employer Alert – Time to Prepare for New Paid Family and Medical Leave Act

In 2019, the State of Connecticut enacted the Paid Family and Medical Leave Act (PFMLA), a…

4 years ago

Governor Lamont’s Actions on Workers Comp During COVID-19 Pandemic

Governor Ned Lamont recently issued Executive Order JJJ stating that employees who contracted COVID-19 in…

4 years ago

Important COVID-19 Labor and Employment Law Updates

Governmental guidance for employers continues to evolve and change on a daily basis. Some recent developments…

4 years ago

U.S. Department of Labor Issues New Guidance for Employers on Remote Work

Even as many states reopen their local economies, many employers are continuing to allow employees…

4 years ago

Understanding the President’s Action on Payroll Taxes

In early August, the President announced he was signing a number of executive orders designed…

4 years ago